Medical News Today: New research may explain why evolution made humans ‘fat’

Scientists have compared fat samples from humans and other primates and found that changes in DNA packaging affected how the human body processes fat.
close up of hand drawing evolution of humans from primates
Evolution made humans the ‘fat primate,’ researchers suggest.

Our bodies need fat to store energy and protect vital organs.

Fat also helps the body absorb some nutrients and produce important hormones.

Dietary fats include saturated fats, trans fats, monounsaturated fats, and polyunsaturated fats, all of which have different properties.

People should try to avoid or only consume saturated and trans fats in moderation because they raise low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or “bad,” cholesterol levels. Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, however, can lower LDL cholesterol levels.

Triglycerides are the most common type of fat in the body. They store excess energy from the food we eat. During digestion, our bodies break these down and transfer them to the cells via the bloodstream. Our bodies use some of this fat as energy and store the rest inside the cells.

Fat metabolism is key to human survival, and any imbalances in the process can lead to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimate that almost 18 million people died from the condition in 2016.

How humans became the ‘fat’ primate

Modern eating habits and a lack of exercise have contributed to the obesity “epidemic,” but new research highlights the role that evolution played in the increasing formation of human body fat.

The scientists found that changes to how DNA is packaged inside fat cells reduced the human body’s ability to turn “bad” fat into “good” fat. The results of the research now appear in the journal Genome Biology and Evolution.

“We’re the fat primates,” says study co-author Devi Swain-Lenz, a postdoctoral associate in biology at Duke University in Durham, NC.

The researchers — who Swain-Lenz and Duke biologist Greg Wray led — compared fat samples from humans, chimps, and other primates using a technique called ATAC-seq. This analyzes how fat cell DNA is packaged in the bodies of different species.

The findings revealed that humans have anywhere from 14% to 31% body fat, while other primates have less than 9%. Also, DNA regions in humans are more condensed, thereby limiting accessibility to the genes involved in fat metabolism.

The researchers also found that around 780 DNA regions were more accessible in chimps and macaques compared with humans. This means that the human body has a reduced capacity to transform bad fat into good fat.

Not all fat is the same

Swain-Lenz explains that most fat is made up of “calorie-storing white fat.” This is the type of fat that accumulates on our bellies and around our waistlines. Other fat cells, called beige and brown fat, help burn calories.

The results of this new study revealed that one of the reasons humans carry more fat is because the DNA regions that should help convert white fat into brown fat are compressed and do not allow this transformation to take place.

“It’s still possible to activate the body’s limited brown fat by doing things like exposing people to cold temperatures, but we need to work for it,” Swain-Lenz adds.

The team believes that early humans may have needed to accumulate fat not just to protect vital organs and warm up, but also to nurture their growing brains. In fact, the human brain tripled in size during evolution, and it now uses more energy than any other organ.

Scientists have been working to understand if promoting the body’s ability to convert white fat to brown fat could reduce obesity, but more research is necessary.

“Maybe we could figure out a group of genes that we need to turn on or off, but we’re still very far from that,” Swain-Lenz concludes.

Early research on Apple’s Health Records service suggests patients generally like it

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images Jeff Williams, chief operating officer of Apple Inc., speaks during an Apple event at the Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park on September 12, 2018 in Cupertino, California. The first research…

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images Jeff Williams, chief operating officer of Apple Inc., speaks during an Apple event at the Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park on September 12, 2018 in Cupertino, California. The first research research on Apples Health Records service has just been released and shows that users have a favorable view of its capabilities, though it hasnt been widely adopted. Researchers at the University of California San Diego Health, one of the first health systems to integrate with Apples health service, spent a few months surveying patients about the technology, and published the results of their research on Friday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). UCSD is among dozens of hospitals working with Apple, letting any patient with an iPhone use the health app to view their labs, charts, immunizations and more. For its research, the hospital sent an anonymous online survey to 425 patients who activated the app in 2018. Of the respondents, 96 percent said they could easily connect their data, 78 percent were satisfied with the service, and 90 percent said it improved the process of sharing their personal health information with friends and family. Less than half saw an improvement across all three vectors. tweet The researchers also shared that by late 2018, the health system had hundreds of personal health record users who have downloaded thousands of clinical results. Thats still relatively small uptake for a large hospital, but Longhurst said there would likely be an increase over time once the hospital starts promoting the service to patients. For that to happen, the hospital needs more data showing increased value. We had a high response rate, with some positive responses, but these were also early adopters, Longhurst said in an interview. Hospitals have historically had major challenges with getting patients to use electronic systems to check their medical information, because the technology tends to be poorly designed and hard to use. Silicon Valley companies that pride themselves on user experience have tried to fix this problem, simplifying the products while also trying to link data from different doctors on disparate systems. Google failed in an early effort, closing down its project in 2011. But mobile technology is ubiquitous now, communications standards have improved and the industry seems to have a greater appetite for making this work. Longhursts team says it might be the right time for technology to make real progress, and Apple has a distinct advantage because its devices are so popular. Ultimately, though, Longhurst said Apple has to prove to the masses that its product is useful, sustainable, scalable, and actually improves health outcomes. var mps=mps||{}; mps._queue=mps._queue||{}; mps._queue.mpsinit=mps._queue.mpsinit||[]; mps._queue.mpsinit.push(function() { mps.insertComponent(#taboola_article_you_may_like, taboola-article-you-may-like) });